Essay --

What exactly is a hippy? Dictionary.com defines one as a person, especially during the 1950s, characterized by a specially strong sense of alienation from most established social activities and relationships. end-to-end history, there have always been droves of individuals who choose to be nonconformists. This is a life style that labels such(prenominal) sight as outcasts, hippies and beatniks. Those who are labeled as such endure a rough lifestyle, whether it is living in nature or perhaps walking the streets as a vagabond. These community know by complex philosophies, but to what purpose? Im fascinated by the fact that they experience discrimination and ridicule, but choose to bound living with it. So exactly what is the appeal to foretellculture? What is it about modern baseball club and the mainstream that causes these people to ostracize themselves and announce their individualism? Thats what I fancy to find out.I decided to track back to the roots of counter culturis t faecess. I discovered that after World War II, the nations economy boomed and fear began to grow over the growing nuclear mail race. Concern about the future led umpteen young people to become more(prenominal) active in social causes, from the civil rights movement to President Kennedys Peace Corps. This generation was kn receive as the beat movement, it specify an ideology for disaffected, rebellious youth of that decade. Due to the economic boom, many people could afford to go to college and enrollment rose from 3.1 million to almost 5 million. Protest began to rage across the country. The beat movement led to many new youth culture movement in the coming years, such as hippie culture. The hippies represented a rebellion against aggregate culture in the U.S. They rejected traditional values an... ...ed to hold their own place in history and be known for fixing an erupt or perhaps toppling the government in their own obscure fashion. I believe that growing numbers of non- conformists happens to be ironic and an entirely distinguishable situation on its own, but perhaps its for a more personal reason. Looking at history up to now, one would pass over my earlier conjecture, who would want to put themselves through hell and ridicule, most in all probability knowing that they cannot cause upheaval alone? I believe that it is repayable to the fact that none of these people are comfortable being meld into a crowd. They strongly look towards transcendentalism to individualize themselves. The youth doesnt want to be labeled as a just other number. They want to feel important and be their own person. Riots and violent protests readiness not be the most orthodox solution, but it sure is effective.