Is drug testing an unwarranted invasion of employee privacy Essay

1. Is drug examination an baseless invasion of employee secretiveness? Applying for a job means that you atomic number 18 in conform to the rules and regulation of the party where you are applying. Once you have been accepted, rive of that is the medical examination including the drug testing. If you are physically and medically fit, thus you are hired. So, the question regarding unwarranted invasion of employee privacy is not pertinent in this situation. You need the job so you have to submit yourself to the requirements of the comp either regarding drug testing.So, it means to say, that the employer has the rights to know the result of the drug testing for them to be able to qualify their employees for any promotion or acceptance to the company. 2. Which is to a massiveer extent importantgetting drugs come to the fore of the give way conduct or protecting the privacy of the employee? Once the employee is positive on drugs, the best thing is to eliminate or terminate the employee rather than having the employee on the workplace. As the saying goes, once thither is a rotten thing in a certain place, in the long run it will make all the things in that place rotten.So, the best thing and the most important are to get the drugs out of the workplace rather than protecting the privacy of the employee. But judging the employee as drug dependent it has to be supported by documents stating that the employee is positive on drugs. 3. What intimately other health-threatening activities, i. e. smoking outside of working hours, unprotected sex, and so forth With the examples given, it is already outside the working hours of the employee and the company has no more go for over those activities.An individual right of the person has to be considered in this matter. It is his/her perk to do those activities that will satisfy his/her needs as long as it will not affect his/her performance on his/her job. But once, the work is affected beca practise of those health -threatening activities then I should say that the individuals trouble must be called or the company may give potency regarding those offenses the employee may commit. The employee has the right to choose between the right and the wrong depends on what is best for him/her. 4.Should employers be allowed to use polygraph tests to screen out potentially expensive employees who may betroth in any of these activities? For the companys benefit, the use of polygraph test to screen out potentially costly employee who may engage in those activities can be allowed. Using the polygraph tests will be of great expense on the part of the employer and the employee. Though it may give a great benefit on the part of the employer by screening the employees that they are going to hire and they are sure that the person who passed the polygraph test are people who can be trusted and will be an summation to the company.But the thing is, are the employees willing to submit themselves on the polygraph testing? An individual right again says that an individual has the right to refuse any test that has to be done to them. So, when they refuse, the employer cant do anything about it but to agree with the employee. But if it is a companys policy then the employee has to make a choice whether to continue or not to continue in applying in the said company.