Legal Brief Essay

Case name, citation, and court Ashley County, atomic number 18 v. Pfizer, Inc, 552 F.3d 659 (8th Cir. 2009) epitome of Key Facts An ingredient widely use in Pfizers products is a incumbent ingredient in the manufacturing of crackpotamphetamine in small toxic labs which are responsible for(p) for dangerous explosions, burns, and toxic fumes.Arkansas has iodin of the largest numbers of small toxic labs in the US and is burdened with high be of struggle the meth epidemic and is want to recoup some of the funds that the coun drags of Arkansas have spent.The Issue Is Pfizer ethically responsible for sanctioning in the funding of fighting the meth epidemic? The Holding Since Pfizer is a study manufacturer of products containing necessary ingredients used in illegal meth labs and the counties of Arkansas has been so heavily fiscally burdened by these labs, the damages are obvious.The counties have suffered financial loss from battling a drug that could not be made without the in gredients in Pfizers products. Because of these damages and Pfizers role in the supply of ingredients to drug labs, it is the responsibility of Pfizer to either, rejoin the counties and finance the future costs of fighting the meth epidemic or hazard alternative ingredients to use in their products that cannot be used in the manufacture of meth. thickset of Your Reasoning It is the corporate responsibility of Pfizer to assist in funding the counties operations battling meth. on a lower floor a corporate citizenship view, Pfizer is responsible for change to the solution of the social problem that their products create. churl is an epidemic rapidly sweeping the republic and it is the responsibility of anyone, or company, with any tie to the drug at all, to contribute to the solution, the equal amount that they contribute to the problem.