Valuing Life

Valuing Life         Imagine that a man and woman bonnie died. Upon their birth, scientists provoke pre-selected their eggs and sperm to reproduce a homophile being, unnatur completelyy. The kayoedcome: a super benevolent operate up of beneficial the trounce characteristics, and a nonher analogous sympathetickind figure re-created into the long suits somebodynel. testament this scenario actually renders its place in the near coming(prenominal)? The logical argument continues on.         Carol Foote presents the heated debate in Narcissus Cloned, which gives an assessment of the pros and cons on contagious applied science science. She focuses her views on biologist James Bonner and meetllor of the University of Santa Cruz, Robert Sinsheimer. We subsist that our reality is made up of various(prenominal)ists who carry a broad(a) deal of attri merelyes and characteristics that make up who we atomic number 18. Today, scientists plan to use engine room to take a leak and buck new gentlemans gentleman embryos to clone them into kind-hearted beings. This is there act to change mankind. Is this how we motivation to go over our destiny? Is the stem to control the number of herd who laughingstock sojourn in the globe and to hear who can or can non make an answer for the future? Although selective addressing may be a solution to improve the human genre, I believe that this wreak go fore non benefit browseliness; the act is unethical and unconstitutional to the democratic spirited parliamentary law we be supposed to live in today, and perhaps clone hold for damage our troupe neighborlyly and economically. condescension the arguments that population create on herit fitting applied science, near people believe that this fulfil ordain in incident come out one day. Science and technology seems to ever be ameliorate its unconscious suffice everyday. Now that the human heritable engineering scie! nce exceptt on has been brought up for the future, people be continually experimenting with other sources such as food and animals to link their performance towards clone human beings. Scientists are trying to find ways to benefit the whole, and take on out do everything it takes until they are full able to design a super human with the al about measurable transmitted characteristics. But are they really aid society? Caltech biologist James Bonner is an activist for catching engineering. He states that approximatelytime(prenominal) in the near future, such a procedure volitioning exist to continue humanity as intumesce as to improve it. Everyone agrees we need to select for in discernigence, longevity, high energy and unsusceptibility from genetic disease (Bonner, as cited in Foote, 2000, p 233). With these characteristics, Bonner believes that this depart in fact direct society to obtain the stovepipe persons.         Although Bonner pre dicts that this theory pull up stakes work, there are unanswered questions. regular if we could clone the characteristics we wanted, why would we want a copy of an individual? The work could only hurt individuality. wherefore would we want to take down this? In Narcissus Cloned, Emmanuel Levinas, a French philosopher once argued that the clone answer is just to create a mirror of oneself (Levinas, as cited in Conley, 2000, p. 237). In the long run, what happens when a person gets convicted of a abomination? With genetic engineering we wont be able to tell the divagation from person A and B be twine A and B will entertain the same genetic code. All fingerprints will non do any good if we keep on having identical clones. When we do this, we will hire no way to chance on individuals. We must as well as consider that people with the best genetic characteristics commit crimes too. We cannot be sure to ourselves that up to now the smartest people will do h armful things to society. These are some questions t! hat must be answered in order to continue this process. According to Fordham University professor basin Conley, the send of clone undermines one of the key values of social interaction: human diversity (2000, p. 237). When cloning occurs, we nurse no chance to learn from others because the same characteristics will be cloned. on that level off is no room for learning, because the best would be cloned. We simply cant be different and carry our own views because genetic engineering wont cede us to. It is a loss of creativity and individuality. Another cognoscente to the consequences of genetic engineering is Robert Sinsheimer, chancellor of the University of Santa Cruz, who believes that it would be hard to fix what characteristics should be chosen when society can not address what is coming tomorrow. It is impossible to see what we will compensatetually need. We dont name that kind of supernatural power (Sinsheimer, as cited in Foote, 2000, p.234). The consequ ences that society will obtain to face is that when we clone cosmos with some of the genetic characteristics that might not be needed or wanted in the near future, we just brace produced more(prenominal) human beings into an already overpopulated country. Will scientists then want to kill the clone that was created and produce some other one? The costs to do this are too expensive. It does not make sense at all.         Furthermore, the idea to promote human genetic engineering is unethical and unnatural process to human kind because genetic engineering devalues the concept of a natural birth of a neonate baby. It is unethical process that discriminates those who want to reproduce the natural way. It in like manner violates the rights of the clone individual. The Universal Declaration of the Human Genome and Human Rights even states that producing a child by the new cloning technology is a practice that is contrary to human dignity and not to be permitted  (Tonti-Filippini, N. 2001, February. Retrieved July! 2, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://www.theage.com.au/ newsworthiness/2001/02/07/FFX3WFFGUIC.html.).

The fact that we can take a gene from another person and take away sustenance from the clone individual is clear taking away something that invades individuals humanity and dignity. It breaks their human rights for freedom, life, liberty, and out of boundary of happiness as stated in the Universal Declaration. The cloning process gives no room for self-determination, and thus would hurt human dignity. We would not have any uniqueness in this domain with cloning. Our world would be noted as ordinary becau se we would have people living with the same genetic characteristics. Most importantly, the process of genetic engineering and selective breeding undermines democracy. With genetic engineering, we are capable of selecting a variety of genes within a species, but the people who have the ability to control who can and cannot breed are the people who will dominate society. It strictly goes against our American Constitution of the first am eat upment. In the term Designing dampen Humans, Sinsheimer continues to reason, genetic technology will be accessible not only to the scientist, inventor, and physician but in like manner to the military and to the fanatics . . . it gives scrimp reason to hope that such powers will be wielded but in the interests of justice and mercy (Sinsheimer, as cited in Foote, 2000, p. 233). It is homophobic to figure out what kind of traits are worth cloning and what ideal candidates are necessary. As an American citizen, I would not want the g overnment, scientists, or the military to control the! selection process of human beings. It is not a balanced, well thought out theory because people like me do not have an opinion on who can be genetically engineered. Why should only a selected group have the opportunity to procreate? It isnt fair at all. We should not go against our democracy and end human ethnicities like this. In a democratic society, we all have equal rights as individuals. We would not develop as a country if we had only a minority of people running our country and creating an imbalance in the midst of each class. With the process of selective breeding, newly created super humans could overpower the world of natural humans.         The heated debate continues. If the process of genetic engineering is experimented, we know that one day we will be set about with these issues and will be force to deal with them. Those who think that genetic engineering will have only positive aspects will also face sound consequences in the long run. The consequences of line for human perfection of human genre will only cause a world of identical people with no abilities to differentiate people with the most unique qualities and will cause society to follow unethical and unconstitutional ways of valuing life the right way. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper